It got muddy (in my eyes) with the realisation of depth with respect to WGS84 (or equivalent). Once they started quoting my FIG papers I realised I was in trouble! I'm not so fussed about my papers, but the FIG publication is worth a read if that's what you're into
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac664/ac664061134ad1b72d9acf7bc9cad275955f3e0f" alt="razz razz"
We have to be so careful that we don't confuse the bathy surface/BAG with referring depths to a geodetic reference frame. OK, perhaps it's only me but I hope not.
Shall I just crawl back into my geo/geeky/hydro box?
No comments:
Post a Comment